Website Search
Find information on spaces, staff, and services.
Find information on spaces, staff, and services.
| LEADER | 03813cam a2200517 i 4500 | |
| 001 | 991023133809602122 | |
| 005 | 20220225213022.0 | |
| 008 | 210914s2022 nyuab b 001 0 eng | |
| 010 | $a 2021036246 | |
| 020 | $a9780197576502$qhardcover | |
| 020 | $a0197576508$qhardcover | |
| 020 | $z9780197576526$qelectronic publication | |
| 035 | $a(OCoLC)1268543058 | |
| 035 | $a17566533 | |
| 035 | $a(OCoLC)on1268543058 | |
| 035 | $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9913502803102121 | |
| 040 | $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dYDX | |
| 042 | $apcc | |
| 043 | $an-mx---$as-bo--- | |
| 049 | $aUIUU | |
| 050 | 00 | $aJL1298.R34$bA35 2022 |
| 082 | 00 | $a324.272/05$223 |
| 100 | 1_ | $aAckerman, Edwin,$eauthor. |
| 245 | 10 | $aOrigins of the mass party :$bdispossession and the party-form in Mexico and Bolivia /$cEdwin F. Ackerman. |
| 264 | _1 | $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c[2022] |
| 300 | $aix, 197 pages :$billustrations, maps ;$c25 cm | |
| 336 | $atext$btxt$2rdacontent | |
| 337 | $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia | |
| 338 | $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier | |
| 504 | $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | |
| 520 | $a"This book argues that the mass party emerged as the product of two distinct but related 'primitive accumulations' - the dismantling of communal land tenure and the corresponding dispossession of means of local administration. It illustrates this argument by studying the party central to one of the longest regimes of the 20th century - the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) in Mexico, which emerged as a mass party during the 1930s and 1940s. I place the PRI in comparative perspective, studying the failed emergence of Bolivsia's Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (MNR) (1952-1964), attempted under similar conditions as the Mexican case. Why was party emergence successful in one case but not the other? As the book shows, the PRI emerged as a mass party in areas in Mexico where land privatization was more intensive and communal village government was weakened, enabling the party's construction and subsequent absorption of peasant unions and organizations. To the extent that the MNR's saw organizational successes, these were limited precisely to areas in Bolivia with similar agrarian structures as those where the PRI succeeded in Mexico. Ultimately, the overall strength of communal property holding and concomitant traditional political authority structures blocked the emergence of the MNR as a mass party. In the parts of Mexico and Bolivia where economic and political expropriation was more pronounced, there was a critical mass of individuals available for political organization, with articulatable interests, and a burgeoning cast of professional politicians, that facilitated connections between the party and the peasantry. The opposite occurred in the areas of the countries were communal property and governmental forms were stronger"--$cProvided by publisher. | |
| 610 | 20 | $aPartido Revolucionario Institucional. |
| 610 | 20 | $aMovimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (Bolivia) |
| 610 | 27 | $aMovimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (Bolivia)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00598860 |
| 610 | 27 | $aPartido Revolucionario Institucional.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00546934 |
| 650 | _0 | $aPolitical parties$zMexico$xHistory. |
| 650 | _0 | $aPolitical parties$zBolivia$xHistory. |
| 650 | _7 | $aPolitical parties.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01069410 |
| 651 | _7 | $aBolivia.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01205549 |
| 651 | _7 | $aMexico.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01211700 |
| 655 | _7 | $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628 |
| 776 | 08 | $iOnline version:$aF. Ackerman, Edwin.$tOrigins of the mass party$dNew York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2022$z9780197576526$w(DLC) 2021036247 |
| LEADER | 05543cam a2200769 i 4500 | |
| 001 | 991023168726502122 | |
| 005 | 20220617050316.0 | |
| 006 | m o d | |
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | |
| 008 | 210808t20222022nyuab ob 001 0 eng | |
| 010 | $a 2021033618 | |
| 019 | $a1295585847 | |
| 020 | $a9780197576526$q(epub) | |
| 020 | $a0197576524 | |
| 020 | $a9780197576519$qelectronic book | |
| 020 | $a9780197576533 | |
| 020 | $a0197576532 | |
| 020 | $a0197576516$qelectronic book | |
| 020 | $z9780197576502$q(hardback) | |
| 035 | $a(OCoLC)1264724765$z(OCoLC)1295585847 | |
| 035 | $a(OCoLC)on1264724765 | |
| 035 | $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9913537736202121 | |
| 040 | $aDLC$beng$erda$epn$cDLC$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dYDX$dTFW$dOCLCO$dQGK$dLGG$dOCLCO$dIUL | |
| 042 | $apcc | |
| 043 | $an-mx---$as-bo--- | |
| 049 | $aGZMA | |
| 050 | 04 | $aJL1298.R45$bA35 2022 |
| 082 | 00 | $a324.972/0842$223 |
| 100 | 1_ | $aAckerman, Edwin,$eauthor. |
| 245 | 10 | $aOrigins of the mass party :$bdispossession and the party-form in Mexico and Bolivia /$cEdwin F. Ackerman. |
| 264 | _1 | $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c[2022] |
| 264 | _4 | $c©2022 |
| 300 | $a1 online resource (ix, 197 pages) :$billustrations, maps | |
| 336 | $atext$btxt$2rdacontent | |
| 337 | $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia | |
| 338 | $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier | |
| 504 | $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | |
| 505 | 0_ | $aMexico and Bolivia in comparative perspective and the sociology of party formation -- Dispossession and the mass party -- The emergence of the PRI in Mexico -- The failure of party formation in Bolivia -- Dispossession and party formation in broader comparative perspective : Germany's SPD and the (absent) British Labour Party. |
| 520 | $a"This book argues that the mass party emerged as the product of two distinct but related 'primitive accumulations' - the dismantling of communal land tenure and the corresponding dispossession of means of local administration. It illustrates this argument by studying the party central to one of the longest regimes of the 20th century - the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) in Mexico, which emerged as a mass party during the 1930s and 1940s. I place the PRI in comparative perspective, studying the failed emergence of Bolivsia's Movimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (MNR) (1952-1964), attempted under similar conditions as the Mexican case. Why was party emergence successful in one case but not the other? As the book shows, the PRI emerged as a mass party in areas in Mexico where land privatization was more intensive and communal village government was weakened, enabling the party's construction and subsequent absorption of peasant unions and organizations. To the extent that the MNR's saw organizational successes, these were limited precisely to areas in Bolivia with similar agrarian structures as those where the PRI succeeded in Mexico. Ultimately, the overall strength of communal property holding and concomitant traditional political authority structures blocked the emergence of the MNR as a mass party. In the parts of Mexico and Bolivia where economic and political expropriation was more pronounced, there was a critical mass of individuals available for political organization, with articulatable interests, and a burgeoning cast of professional politicians, that facilitated connections between the party and the peasantry. The opposite occurred in the areas of the countries were communal property and governmental forms were stronger"--Provided by publisher. | |
| 588 | $aDescription based on online resource; title from PDF title page (Oxford Scholarship Online, viewed on June 3, 2022). | |
| 610 | 20 | $aPartido Revolucionario Institucional$xHistory. |
| 610 | 20 | $aMovimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (Bolivia)$xHistory. |
| 610 | 27 | $aMovimiento Nacionalista Revolucionario (Bolivia)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00598860 |
| 610 | 27 | $aPartido Revolucionario Institucional.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00546934 |
| 650 | _0 | $aPolitical parties$zMexico$xHistory$y20th century. |
| 650 | _0 | $aPolitical parties$zBolivia$xHistory$y20th century. |
| 650 | _0 | $aDominant-party systems$zMexico$xHistory$y20th century. |
| 650 | _0 | $aDominant-party systems$zBolivia$xHistory$y20th century. |
| 650 | _0 | $aLand tenure$xPolitical aspects$zMexico. |
| 650 | _0 | $aLand tenure$xPolitical aspects$zBolivia. |
| 651 | _0 | $aMexico$xPolitics and government$y1910-1946. |
| 651 | _0 | $aBolivia$xPolitics and government$y1952-1982. |
| 650 | _6 | $aSystèmes de parti dominant$zMexique$xHistoire$y20e siècle. |
| 650 | _6 | $aSystèmes de parti dominant$zBolivie$xHistoire$y20e siècle. |
| 651 | _6 | $aMexique$xPolitique et gouvernement$y1910-1946. |
| 651 | _6 | $aBolivie$xPolitique et gouvernement$y1952-1982. |
| 650 | _7 | $aDominant-party systems.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01919355 |
| 650 | _7 | $aLand tenure$xPolitical aspects.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00991400 |
| 650 | _7 | $aPolitical parties.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01069410 |
| 650 | _7 | $aPolitics and government.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01919741 |
| 651 | _7 | $aBolivia.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01205549 |
| 651 | _7 | $aMexico.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01211700 |
| 648 | _7 | $a1900-1999$2fast |
| 655 | _7 | $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628 |
| 776 | 08 | $iPrint version:$aAckerman, Edwin.$tOrigins of the mass party.$dNew York, NY : Oxford University Press, [2022]$z9780197576502$w(DLC) 2021036246$w(OCoLC)1268543058 |
| 856 | 40 | $uhttps://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780197576502.001.0001/oso-9780197576502 |