MARC Bibliographic Record

LEADER04221cam a2200661 a 4500
001 991023112942202122
005 20220303213021.0
006 m o d
007 cr un|||||||||
008 060608s1994 mau ob 000 0 eng d
035    $a(OCoLC)70048407
035    $a(OCoLC)ocm70048407
035    $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9913452221702121
040    $aOUN$beng$epn$cOUN$dOCLCQ$dNTE$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF$dDKDLA$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dNLC$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dWYU$dYOU$dEYM$dNBERS$dOCLCQ
043    $an-us---$an------$an-mx---$an-cn---
049    $aGZMA
050 _4 $aH11$b.N2434x no.4790
084    $aF13$2jelc
084    $aQ17$2jelc
100 1_ $aOrden, David.
245 10 $aAgricultural interest groups and the North American Free Trade Agreement /$cDavid Orden.
264 _1 $aCambridge, MA. :$bNational Bureau of Economic Research,$c[1994]
300    $a1 online resource (73 pages)
336    $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337    $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338    $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
347    $adata file$2rda
490 1_ $aNBER working paper series ;$vno. 4790
500    $a"July 1994."
504    $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 71-73).
588 0_ $aPrint version record.
520 8_ $aAbstract: This paper evaluates the influence of diverse U.S. agricultural interest groups on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Under NAFTA, licenses and quotas that restricted agricultural trade between Mexico and the United States were converted to tariffs in January 1994 and all tariffs are to be phased out over adjustment periods of up to 15 years. The agricultural provisions of the 1988 Canada-U.S. FTA, which left quantitative barriers intact for dairy, poultry and other sectors, remain in effect for bilateral Canadian- U.S. trade. NAFTA received support from export-oriented U.S. producers of most grains, oilseeds, livestock, and some horticultural products. Opposition was expressed by wheat producers, seeking leverage on Canadian export-pricing issues, and protected sugar, peanut, and winter fruit and vegetable producers. The opposition was not addressed in the side agreements negotiated by the Clinton administration but the agricultural commodity groups were able to bargain for accommodations in the subsequent legislative debate. Final concessions protect U.S. sugar from Mexican competition, provide some transition protection to winter fruits and vegetables, and ensnarl the United States in disputes about Canadian exports of wheat and peanut butter. With these concessions, NAFTA results in essentially no reform of entrenched domestic agricultural support programs in the United States (or Canada) during the lengthy tariff phase-out periods.
650 _0 $aProduce trade$zUnited States.
650 _0 $aAgriculture$xSocieties, etc.$xPolitical activity$zUnited States.
650 _0 $aAgriculture and state$zUnited States$xDecision making.
650 _0 $aFarmers$xPolitical activity$zUnited States.
650 _0 $aFree trade$zNorth America.
651 _0 $aUnited States$xCommerce$zMexico.
651 _0 $aMexico$xCommerce$zUnited States.
651 _0 $aUnited States$xCommerce$zCanada.
651 _0 $aCanada$xCommerce$zUnited States.
650 _7 $aAgriculture and state$xDecision making.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00801732
650 _7 $aAgriculture$xSocieties, etc.$xPolitical activity.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00801654
650 _7 $aCommerce.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00869279
650 _7 $aFarmers$xPolitical activity.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00921352
650 _7 $aFree trade.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00933944
650 _7 $aProduce trade.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01078136
651 _7 $aCanada.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204310
651 _7 $aMexico.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01211700
651 _7 $aNorth America.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01242475
651 _7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 _7 $aAgriculture in International Trade.$2jelc
650 _7 $aTrade Policy; International Trade Organizations.$2jelc
710 2_ $aNational Bureau of Economic Research.
830 _0 $aWorking paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) ;$vworking paper no. 4790.
856 40 $uhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w4790

MMS IDs

Document ID: 9913452221702121
Network Electronic IDs: 9913452221702121
Network Physical IDs:
mms_mad_ids: 991023112942202122