Citation Data
MLA
Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703. An Argument Proving, That the Abrogation of King James by the People of England from the Regal Throne, and the Promotion of the Prince of Orange, One of the Royal Family, to the Throne of the Kingdom in His Stead, Was According to the Constitution of the English Government, and Prescribed by It : in Opposition to All the False and Treacherous Hypotheses, of Usurpation, Conquest, Desertion, and of Taking the Powers That Are upon Content. London :Printed for the author, 1692.
APA
Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703. (1692). An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the Royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it : in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. London :Printed for the author,
Chicago
Johnson, Samuel, 1649-1703. An Argument Proving, That the Abrogation of King James by the People of England from the Regal Throne, and the Promotion of the Prince of Orange, One of the Royal Family, to the Throne of the Kingdom in His Stead, Was According to the Constitution of the English Government, and Prescribed by It : in Opposition to All the False and Treacherous Hypotheses, of Usurpation, Conquest, Desertion, and of Taking the Powers That Are upon Content. London :Printed for the author, 1692.
warning
Note: These citations are software generated and may contain errors. To verify accuracy, check the appropriate style guide.
Closeclose
Export to Citation Manager (RIS)
Back to item