MARC Bibliographic Record

LEADER03708cam a2200637 i 4500
001 991022513495302122
005 20200930063436.4
008 181003s2019 nyua b 001 0 eng
010    $a 2018046823
015    $aGBB9C9868$2bnb
016 7_ $a019483062$2Uk
020    $a9780190945350$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
020    $a0190945354$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
035    $a(YBP)15902689
035    $a(OCoLC)1080245141
035    $a(OCoLC)on1080245141
035    $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9913074909702121
040    $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dERASA$dUKMGB$dYDX$dCHVBK$dOCLCO$dIBI
042    $apcc
049    $aGZMA
050 00 $aBJ1595$b.P835 2019
082 00 $a170/.42$223
100 1_ $aPortmore, Douglas W.$eauthor.
245 10 $aOpting for the best :$boughts and options /$cDouglas W. Portmore.
264 _1 $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c[2019]
300    $axvii, 324 pages ;$c25 cm.
336    $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337    $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338    $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1_ $aOxford moral theory
504    $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 8_ $aWe ought to opt for the best-that is, we ought to choose the option that is best in terms of whatever ultimately matters. So, if maximizing happiness is what ultimately matters, then we ought to perform the option that results in the most happiness. And if, instead, abiding by the Golden Rule is what ultimately matters, then we ought to perform the option that best abides by this rule. However, even if we know what ultimately matters, this is not always sufficient for determining which option we ought to perform. There are other questions that we need to consider as well. Which events are options for us? How do we rank our options-in terms of their own goodness or in terms of the goodness of the best options that entail them? How exactly does that which ultimately matters determine which options we ought to perform? In Opting for the Best, Douglas W. Portmore focuses on these three questions, which he argues can best be answered by putting aside any specific determination of what ultimately matters. He argues that tackling these three questions is crucial to solving many of the puzzles concerning what we ought to do, including those involving supererogation, indeterminate outcomes, overdetermined outcomes, predictable future misbehavior, and good acts that entail bad acts, among others. Engaging with arguments in areas as wide-ranging as action theory and deontic logic, the solutions that Portmore offers systematize our thinking about some of the most complex issues in practical philosophy.
650 _0 $aConduct of life.
650 _0 $aDecision making.
650 _0 $aChoice (Psychology)
650 _0 $aValues.
650 _7 $aChoice (Psychology)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00858327
650 _7 $aConduct of life.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00874563
650 _7 $aDecision making.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00889035
650 _7 $aValues.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01163906
650 _7 $aDeontologie$2gnd
650 _7 $aMaximum$2gnd
650 _7 $aPraktische Philosophie$2gnd
650 _7 $aTeleologie$2gnd
776 08 $iOnline version:$aPortmore, Douglas W., author.$tOpting for the best$dNew York : Oxford University Press, 2019$z9780190945367$w(DLC) 2019014471
830 _0 $aOxford moral theory
950    $a20201125$bgobi$cc$dp$egls$9local

MMS IDs

Document ID: 9913074909702121
Network Electronic IDs:
Network Physical IDs: 9913074909702121
mms_mad_ids: 991022513495302122