"In this book, [the author] takes on the challenge of demonstrating that historically American law makers did consider a statutory methodology as part of formulating laws. In the nineteenth century, when the people wanted laws they could understand, lawyers inflicted judge-made, statute-destroying, common law on them. [The authors] offers the cure for common law, in the form of sensible statute law. Building on this historical evidence, [the author] shows how rule-making in civil law jurisdictions in other countries makes for a far more equitable legal system. Sensible statute laws fit together: one statute governs, as opposed to several laws that even lawyers have trouble disentangling. In a statute law system, lawmakers make laws for the common good in sensible procedures, and judges apply sensible laws and do not make them. This book shows how such a system works in Germany and would be a solution for the American legal system as well."--
Introduction: Of governments and laws -- America's exceptionalism in 1876 : systematizing laws -- Common law is not an option -- Founding a government of laws -- Building a government of laws in the first century of the republic -- The rise and fall of codes fin de siècle -- Historical epilogue : from past to present -- Inviting comparison : a gift horse in two lands -- Systematizing and simplifying statutes -- Lawmaking for the common good -- Federalism and localism -- Constitutional review -- Applying laws -- Conclusion: Learning from others -- Appendix. The foreign law controversy and the fate of civil law scholarship in American law schools
The information below has been drawn from sources outside of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Libraries. In most instances, the information will be from sources that have not been peer reviewed by scholarly or research communities. Please report cases in which the information is inaccurate through the Contact Us link below.