Journal competition and the quality of published research : simultaneous versus sequential screening

Gehrig, Thomas, author

Publication Details Click to collapse Cite/Export


  • We explore how the nature of the screening technology and the organization of the submission system affect the screening incentives of competing journals. Total screening in a duopolistic journal industry exceeds that of a monopoly. Exclusivity requirements for submissions induce more screening than systems with parallel submission. Interestingly, in the sequential screening model established journal rankings tend to reduce screening incentives. The screening technology determines whether the high-ranked or low-ranked journal have stronger screening incentives, which has implications for the long-run stability of established rankings.


  • "Published 29 May 2017"
  • "Submitted 29 May 2017"
  • Includes bibliographical references (pages 34-36).
Checking the Web...