MARC Bibliographic Record

LEADER02015cam a2200361 i 4500
001 99101620133602122
005 20140811183256.0
008 140129s2014 ncu b 001 0 eng
010    $a 2014003985
020    $a1611635888 (alk. paper)
020    $a9781611635881 (alk. paper)
035    $a(OCoLC)ocn869881371
035    $a(WU)10162013-uwmadisondb
035    $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9910206604402121
040    $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDX$dYDXCP$dZXQ$dOCLCO$dONS
042    $apcc
043    $an-us---
050 00 $aKF380$b.H84 2014
082 00 $a340/.11$223
100 1_ $aHuhn, Wilson Ray,$d1950-$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe five types of legal argument /$cWilson Huhn.
250    $aThird edition.
264 _1 $aDurham, North Carolina :$bCarolina Academic Press,$c[2014]
300    $axv, 228 pages ;$c22 cm
336    $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337    $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338    $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504    $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0_ $aThe purpose of legal education -- The five types of legal arguments -- Text -- Intent -- Precedent -- Tradition -- Policy -- Identifying the five types of legal arguments -- Creating persuasive arguments -- How to attack legal arguments -- Intra-type attacks on textual arguments -- Intra-type attacks on intent arguments -- Intra-type attacks on precedent arguments -- Intra-type attacks on tradition arguments -- Intra-type attacks on policy arguments -- Cross-type arguments -- Foundational cross-type arguments -- Relational cross-type arguments -- Text versus intent -- Precedent versus policy -- Text versus policy -- Text versus precedent -- A logical demonstration of the theory of the five types of legal argument -- Reasoning by analogy is the bridge between formalism and realism -- Discovering a court's judicial philosophy and your own philosophy of life.
650 _0 $aLaw$zUnited States$xMethodology.
650 _0 $aJudicial process$zUnited States.
650 _0 $aLegal composition.
650 _0 $aPersuasion (Rhetoric)
997    $aMARCIVE

MMS IDs

Document ID: 9910206604402121
Network Electronic IDs:
Network Physical IDs: 9910206604402121
mms_mad_ids: 99101620133602122
mms_sup_ids: 996320563602132