on, but the still more imporl 
I heard of one 160-acre 
am), and located near Rochesi 
ionally favorable for quauL 
h was completely de-bzrshed I 
t  covies in 1925. Mr. Frei 
us at the opening and, 0los 
 
effects of the removal of brush c 
too mali to be idea for moaswU 
to be greater by the spring of 1l 
Mr. Prank I. Wallace, st 
giving it as his opinion that fei 
than detrimental from the viewpo: 
farms. Ie thinks that the birds 
control the insect risk to at lo 
coverts wore removed and there w 
Of course ay euch generalisatio3 
possible local combination of Col 
noe on the part of an agricultu 
If it be true that oovei 
On Indiana qmail, by what mocnan: 
In my opinion the answer Is the i 
reports, namey: by componsatln4 
gNse crop and thus giving him an 
and SMr other management meassrsi 
torested in harvesting his oin 02 
quail for other reasons than sho 
neceeesar incentive.