ATOMIC ENERGY                         553

                             [Subannex]
         Interni  Uraniumn Allocation Agreement for 1950

  1. Sufficient raw material to meet the full expanded U.S. require-
anent of 2,934 tons for 1950, after allowing for supplies from other
sources, shall be shipped and lallocated to the United States of America
from Congo production.
  2. If, as estimated, the total quantity available from U.S., Canadian
and Congo sources exceeds the figure of 2,934 tons by 131 tons, 130 tons
of material shall be shipped from the Congo to the U.K. If the excess
production is less than 130 tons, the lesser figure will be shipped to the
United Kingdom.
   3. It is understood that this interim allocation does not apply to
ýstocks presently unallocated.
  4. This arrangement shall be subject to immediate review at the
  request of any of the three Governments.
  5. The U.S. members of the Combined Policy Committee ,wish to
-have it recorded that in the event that the above-mentioned U.S. re-
-quirements cannot be met from    supplies from  other sources, they
Will be obliged to request an allocation to meet the deficiency from
presently unallocated stocks in the U.K.
   APRIL 18, 1950.

                              [Annex C]

 Me~morandum   by the British Members"' of the Combined Policy
             Coimmittee to the United States Members

                        BRAZILIAN MONAZITE
   The U.K. members of the Combined Development Agency request
 the concurrence of the U.S. members, in conformity with para. 4 of
 the Exchange of Notes between Lord Halifax and Mr. Acheson regard-
 ing the Brazilian-U.S. Agreement,'2 to the importation into the United

   Sir Oliver Franks, British Ambassador in the United States, and Sir Derick
 lIoyer Millar, Minister, British Embassy.
   I" Reference is to an exchange of letters between Lord Halifax, the
British
 Amnbassador in the United States, and Dean Acheson, the Acting Secretary
of
 !State, September 19 and September 24, 1945; for texts, see Foreign Relations,
 1945, vol. ii, pp. 4A-45 and 47-48. By means of the letters, the United
States and
 United Kingdom agreed that the United Kingdom had acquired the same ri~ghts
 and assumed the same ,res~ponsibilities ,tha~t i~t would have acquired and
assumed
 had the U.S.-Brazilian Agreement o)f July 6, 1945 (ibid., pp. 20-23), been
con-
 eluded with Brazil by the United States and the United Kingdom acting jointly.
 Paragraph 4 of each le~tter stated that the Combined Development Trust would
 act on tbehalf of the United Sta~tes ,and U~nited Kingdom in all matters
relating
 to the fulfillmenlt of the agreemen~t.