Gbs preview button

Feminist judgments : rewritten opinions of the United States Supreme Court

Stanchi, Kathryn M., editor

Publication Details Click to collapse Cite/Export

  • Creator Kathryn M. Stanchi, Temple University, School of Law ; Linda L. Berger, University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law ; Bridget J. Crawford, Pace University, School of Law
  • Format Books
  • Contributors
  • Publication New York NY : Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • Series
  • Physical Details
    • xlvii, 566 pages ; 23 cm
  • ISBNs 9781107126626, 1107126622, 9781107565609, 110756560X
  • OCLC ocn940342395

Summary

  • "What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant U.S. Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging"--Publisher's website.

Notes

  • Includes bibliographical references and index.

Contents

  • Introduction to the U.S. Feminist Judgments Project / Kathryn M. Stanchi, Linda L. Berger and Bridget J. Crawford -- Talking back : from feminist history and theory to feminist legal methods and judgments / Berta Esperanza Hernández-Truyol -- Bradwell v. Illinois, 83 U.S. 130 (1873) / Kimberly Holst, Phyllis Goldfarb -- Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) / Andrea Doneff, Pamela Laufer-Ukeles -- Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) / Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Laura Rosenbury -- Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) / Inga N. Laurent, Teri McMurtry-Chubb -- Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972) / Nancy D. Polikoff, Karen Syma Czapanskiy -- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) / Rachel Rebouché, Kimberly M. Mutcherson -- Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) / Iselin M. Gambert, Dara E. Purvis -- Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974) / Maya Manian, Lucinda M. Finley -- Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) / Brenda A. Smith, Maria L. Ontiveros -- City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) / Cassandra Jones Havard, Tracy A. Thomas -- Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980) / Mary Ziegler, Leslie C. Griffin -- Michael M. v. Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) / Margo Kaplan, Cynthia Godsoe -- Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981) / Jamie R. Abrams, Davis S. Cohen -- Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) / Kristen Konrad Tiscione, Angela Onwuachi-Willig -- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) / Deborah Gordon, Deborah L. Rhode -- Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989) / Dale Margolin Cecka, Martha Chamallas -- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) / Macarena Sáez, Lisa R. Pruitt -- United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) / Christine M. Venter, Valorie K. Vojdik -- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) / Margaret E. Johnson, Ann C. McGinley -- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998) / Michelle S. Simon, Ann Bartow -- United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000) / Shaakirrah R. Sanders, Anibal Rosario Lebrón -- Nguyen v. INS, 533 U.S. 53 (2001) / Sandra S. Park, Ilene Durst -- Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) / Kris McDaniel-Miccio, Ruthann Robson -- Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005) / Patricia A. Broussard, Maria Isabel Medina -- Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) / Erez Aloni, Carlos A. Ball