MARC Bibliographic Record

LEADER02437cam a22003378i 4500
001 9992651663602122
005 20180324152610.0
008 121213s2013 ilu b 001 0 eng
010    $a 2012050115
020    $a9781614388371 (print : alk. paper)
020    $a1614388377 (print : alk. paper)
035    $a(OCoLC)ocn821560854
035    $a(WU)9265166-uwmadisondb
035    $a(EXLNZ-01UWI_NETWORK)9910135153302121
040    $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dGUL$dRCJ$dGZL
042    $apcc
043    $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8965$b.Z474 2013
082 00 $a347.73/67$223
100 1_ $aZervopoulos, John A.,$eauthor.
245 10 $aHow to examine mental health experts :$ba family lawyer's handbook of issues and strategies /$cJohn A. Zervopoulos, Ph.D., J.D.
250    $aFirst edition.
264 _1 $aChicago, Illinois :$bAmerican Bar Association,$c©2013.
300    $axxv, 238 pages ;$c23 cm
336    $atext$2rdacontent
337    $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338    $avolume$2rdacarrier
504    $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0_ $aHow qualified is qualified? -- When experts rely on experts -- Consulting versus testifying experts: is there a problem? -- Retained experts and their testimony: hired gun or credible? -- Retaining and working with your expert -- Peer into counseling's black box -- Psychological evaluations: more than just testing -- Make sense of psychological tests -- Psychological tests and catching lies -- Make sense of computer-based test reports -- Collateral information: uses and abuses -- Tie experts to professional practice guidelines -- Let the records show -- Use Daubert's reliability toolbox -- Daubert's reliability toolbox: general acceptance and peer review/publication -- Daubert's reliability toolbox: testability and error rates -- Mental health testimony = conclusions + opinions -- Manage experience-based testimony -- It's research, but is it relevant? -- DSM-IV diagnoses: what's the problem? -- Use the analytical gap test: Joiner's versatile reliability metaphor -- Recognize and challenge experts' judgment biases -- Hiding the gap: the power of words -- Recommendations; where the rubber meets the road -- Interim reports: half-baked or reliable? -- Size up evaluation reports: what's the purpose? -- Mine the report's treasures -- Rescue an expert's testimony? try Daubert's flexibile side.
650 _0 $aEvidence, Expert$zUnited States.
650 _0 $aForensic psychology.
997    $aMARCIVE

MMS IDs

Document ID: 9910135153302121
Network Electronic IDs:
Network Physical IDs: 9910135153302121
mms_mad_ids: 9992651663602122